<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hephaestus Audio &#187; Physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/category/physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hephaestusaudio.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Physics Friday &#8211; Blackbody Radiation</title>
		<link>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/11/27/physics-friday-blackbody-radiation/</link>
		<comments>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/11/27/physics-friday-blackbody-radiation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hephaestusaudio.com/?p=1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Please forgive the bitter tone that follows in this post, but recently I came across an &#8220;audiophile&#8221; device that I feel may damage the already precarious position of the audiophile industry.  First however a little necessary physics background&#8230; A &#8220;Blackbody&#8221; is an object that does not reflect electromagnetic energy incident upon it, or allow any to pass through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"> <img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1789" title="Blackbody Radiation" src="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/11/Blackbody-Radiation-500x500.jpg" alt="Blackbody Radiation" width="500" height="500" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Please forgive the bitter tone that follows in this post, but recently I came across an &#8220;audiophile&#8221; device that I feel may damage the already precarious position of the audiophile industry.  First however a little necessary physics background&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body">Blackbody</a>&#8221; is an object that does not reflect electromagnetic energy incident upon it, or allow any to pass through it.  Any emission from it is entirely thermal in nature with no characteristic emission/absorption lines from any element.  This is referred to as &#8220;Blackbody Radiation&#8221;.  Classical theory describes this spectrum with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh%E2%80%93Jeans_law">Rayleigh-Jeans Law</a>:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=I%28%5Clambda%20%2CT%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B2%5Cpi%20ckT%7D%7B%5Clambda%20%5E%7B4%7D%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="I(\lambda ,T)=\frac{2\pi ckT}{\lambda ^{4}}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="I(\lambda ,T)=\frac{2\pi ckT}{\lambda ^{4}}" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=I%28%5Clambda%20%2CT%29&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="I(\lambda ,T)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="I(\lambda ,T)" /> is the power per unit area<br />
<img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=c&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="c" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="c" /> is the speed of light<br />
<img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=k&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="k" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="k" /> is Boltzmann&#8217;s constant<br />
<img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=T&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="T" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="T" /> is the temperature in Kelvin<br />
<img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%5Clambda&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="\lambda" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="\lambda" /> is the wavelength</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This is in agreement with observation at lower frequencies, however the problem with this result is that at higher frequencies (i.e. as <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%5Clambda%20%5Cto%200&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="\lambda \to 0" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="\lambda \to 0" />) the power approaches infinity!  This is certainly not in agreement with observation and has been referred to as the &#8220;ultraviolet catastrophe&#8221;.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A physicist by the name of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck">Max Plank</a> made an amazing assumption that was to prove instrumental not only for resolving the paradox of the Rayleigh-Jeans law, but for all of quantum mechanics.  The assumption is that radiation can only only assume <em>discrete</em> energy values:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=E_%7Bn%7D%3Dnhf&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="E_{n}=nhf" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="E_{n}=nhf" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=n&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="n" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="n" /> is the energy level<br />
<img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=h&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="h" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="h" /> is Planck&#8217;s constant<br />
<img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=f&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="f" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="f" /> is the frequency.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Therefore the energy between two adjacent energy states is given by:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=E%3Dhf&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="E=hf" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="E=hf" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The power per unit area spectrum that results from this important assumption agrees with observation and is given by the following expression:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=I%28%5Clambda%20%2CT%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B2%5Cpi%20hc%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B%5Clambda%20%5E%7B5%7D%28exp%28%5Cfrac%7Bhc%7D%7B%5Clambda%20kT%7D%29-1%29%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="I(\lambda ,T)=\frac{2\pi hc^{2}}{\lambda ^{5}(exp(\frac{hc}{\lambda kT})-1)}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="I(\lambda ,T)=\frac{2\pi hc^{2}}{\lambda ^{5}(exp(\frac{hc}{\lambda kT})-1)}" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now I return to the bitter part of my post.  As I make clear in my <a href="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2008/11/engineering-perspective.pdf">Engineering Perspective</a> article, I am not a big fan of overpriced audio interconnects.  I am not saying there isn&#8217;t a subjective improvement, but that it may not provide the greatest benefit to cost ratio for the audiophile.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, at least these overpriced interconnects are <em>functional.</em>  At worst, they get the signal from point A to point B.  Even something as esoteric as a special wooden volume knob that improves your sound at least allows you to turn up the volume!  <strong>But a product that claims to dramatically improve your system by acting as an electromagnetic blackbody for your equipment is a complete waste.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There are people in this world with incredible perception that can detect &#8220;impossible&#8221; subtleties.  The purpose of the audiophile industry is to cater to these individuals &#8211; those for whom minute differences matter.  Please try to give these gifted individuals the audio experience they deserve and not just another piece of junk backed up with horrible pseudoscience.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1790 aligncenter" title="Snake Oil" src="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/11/Snake-Oil-348x499.jpg" alt="Snake Oil" width="348" height="499" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/11/27/physics-friday-blackbody-radiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physics Friday &#8211; Calculus of Variations</title>
		<link>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/07/10/physics-friday-calculus-of-variations/</link>
		<comments>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/07/10/physics-friday-calculus-of-variations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hephaestusaudio.com/?p=1616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1621" title="Calculus of Variations" src="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/07/Calculus-of-Variations.JPG" alt="Calculus of Variations" width="400" height="330" /></p>
<p>“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely in your thoughts advanced to the state of Science, whatever the matter may be.” &#8211; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Thomson,_1st_Baron_Kelvin">Lord Kelvin</a></p>
<p>I do not completely agree with Lord Kelvin&#8217;s assertion, but there is no doubt that you must understand a subject really, really well in order to translate it into the language of mathematics.  Once you have done so however, a whole world of tools opens up.  Not only the vast array analytical tools of past generations, but the powerful simulation tools of the present.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_of_variations">Calculus of Variations</a> is one such tool &#8211; one that allows you to determine what is <em>optimum</em>, whether in terms of cost, time, quality, etc.</p>
<p>Please refer to this <a href="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/07/Calculus-of-Variations.pdf">article</a> for more background on the Calculus of Variations, as well as the derivation of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%E2%80%93Lagrange_equation">Euler-Lagrange Equation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/07/10/physics-friday-calculus-of-variations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos and the Logistic Map</title>
		<link>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/02/16/chaos-and-the-logistic-map/</link>
		<comments>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/02/16/chaos-and-the-logistic-map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hephaestusaudio.com/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linearity is the exception rather than the norm.  We live in a very nonlinear world &#8211; for example, it is now known that a sinusoidally driven resistor/diode/inductor combination can exhibit chaotic behavior!  Please refer to this excellent SPS Report. One of the simplest equations that demonstrates this nonlinear behavior &#8211; this chaos &#8211; is the &#8220;Discrete [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linearity is the exception rather than the norm.  We live in a very nonlinear world &#8211; for example, it is now known that a sinusoidally driven resistor/diode/inductor combination can exhibit chaotic behavior!  Please refer to this excellent <a href="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/02/sps-report.pdf">SPS Report</a>.</p>
<p>One of the simplest equations that demonstrates this nonlinear behavior &#8211; this chaos &#8211; is the &#8220;Discrete Logistic Equation&#8221; or the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_map">Logistic Map</a>&#8220;.  Mathematically, it is given by:</p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=x_%7Bk%2B1%7D%3Drx_%7Bk%7D%5Cleft%281-x_%7Bk%7D%5Cright%29&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="x_{k+1}=rx_{k}\left(1-x_{k}\right)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="x_{k+1}=rx_{k}\left(1-x_{k}\right)" /></p>
<p>This is typically used as a simple model of population growth with finite resources (i.e. food).  <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=x_%7Bk%2B1%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="x_{k+1}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="x_{k+1}" /> represents the population at the next time step, based on that at the previous time step <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=x_%7Bk%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="x_{k}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="x_{k}" /> where <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=0%5Cleq%20x_%7Bk%7D%5Cleq%201&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="0\leq x_{k}\leq 1" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="0\leq x_{k}\leq 1" /> with &#8220;growth rate&#8221; <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=r&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="r" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="r" /> where <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=0%5Cleq%20r%5Cleq%204&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="0\leq r\leq 4" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="0\leq r\leq 4" />.  A plot of the logistic map with respect to growth rate is given below for the interval <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=2.4%5Cleq%20r%5Cleq%204.0&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="2.4\leq r\leq 4.0" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="2.4\leq r\leq 4.0" />:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-632 aligncenter" title="Logistic 1" src="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/02/logistic-1-500x353.png" alt="Logistic 1" width="500" height="353" /> </p>
<p>Using MATLAB, more sophisticated visualization is possible that may give greater insight into what is happening to the population dynamics as the growth parameter is varied.  For example, how the periodic regions return to chaos via a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period-doubling_bifurcation">period-doubling bifurcation</a>.  Shown below is the interval <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=3.5%5Cleq%20r%5Cleq%204.0&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="3.5\leq r\leq 4.0" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="3.5\leq r\leq 4.0" />: </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/02/Logistic-2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1434 aligncenter" title="Logistic 2" src="http://hephaestusaudio.com/media/2009/02/Logistic-2-500x375.jpg" alt="Logistic 2" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>One lesson to take from all this with respect to audio electronics is that <em>simplicity is best!</em>  If a resistor/diode/inductor can result in chaos, then what can the circuitry in an overly complicated amplifier do?  Not only in electronics is simplicity the best, for example in Strunk and White&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Style">The Elements of Style</a> there is the simple mantra: &#8220;Omit needless words!&#8221;  Vastly different disciplines &#8211; same guiding principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2009/02/16/chaos-and-the-logistic-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physics Friday &#8211; Hamiltonian Mechanics</title>
		<link>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2008/12/05/physics-friday-hamiltonian-mechanics/</link>
		<comments>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2008/12/05/physics-friday-hamiltonian-mechanics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hephaestusaudio.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hamiltonian mechanics is an elegant way of formulating problems is classical mechanics.  Also, it provides insight into the world of quantum mechanics, as is evident with the Schrodinger equation. The basic equations: Where  are the generalized coordinates and are the generalized momenta.  H is the Hamiltonian and represents the total energy of the closed system [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics">Hamiltonian mechanics</a> is an elegant way of formulating problems is classical mechanics.  Also, it provides insight into the world of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics">quantum mechanics</a>, as is evident with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation">Schrodinger equation</a>.</p>
<p>The basic equations:</p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cdot%7Bq%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20p%7DH&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="\dot{q}=\frac{\partial }{\partial p}H" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="\dot{q}=\frac{\partial }{\partial p}H" /></p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cdot%7Bp%7D%3D-%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20q%7DH&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="\dot{p}=-\frac{\partial }{\partial q}H" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="\dot{p}=-\frac{\partial }{\partial q}H" /></p>
<p>Where <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=q%3Dq%28t%29&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="q=q(t)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="q=q(t)" /> are the <em>generalized coordinates</em> and <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=p%3Dp%28t%29&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="p=p(t)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="p=p(t)" /> are the <em>generalized momenta</em>.  H is the <em>Hamiltonian</em> and represents the total energy of the closed system (i.e. conservative) under consideration.  <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=H%3DT%2BV&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="H=T+V" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="H=T+V" /> where T is the <em>kinetic</em> energy and V is the <em>potential</em> energy.  Also note that <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cdot%7Bq%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="\dot{q}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="\dot{q}" /> represents the time derivative of the position, or the <em>velocity</em>, and that <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cdot%7Bp%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="\dot{p}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="\dot{p}" /> represents the time derivative of the momentum, or the <em>force</em>.</p>
<p>These two equations yield the evolution of the mechanical system.  Aesthetically they are quite pleasing, owing to their nearly perfect symmetry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2008/12/05/physics-friday-hamiltonian-mechanics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physics Friday &#8211; Maxwell&#8217;s Equations</title>
		<link>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2008/11/28/physics-friday-maxwells-equations/</link>
		<comments>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2008/11/28/physics-friday-maxwells-equations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hephaestusaudio.com/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while it is important to take those dusty tomes down off the top shelf, or out of those boxes behind the furnace in the basement, and remind ourselves exactly what makes all this stuff tick.  Periodically I plan to post a little something about these fundamentals &#8211; &#8220;Physics Friday&#8221;. This Friday the topic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while it is important to take those dusty tomes down off the top shelf, or out of those boxes behind the furnace in the basement, and remind ourselves exactly what makes all this stuff tick.  Periodically I plan to post a little something about these fundamentals &#8211; &#8220;Physics Friday&#8221;.</p>
<p>This Friday the topic is one that is crucial for electronics: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations">Maxwell&#8217;s equations</a>.  There are a few different ways of presenting these equations, the most common one is in integral form.  This is a great form for introducing the topic, but there are only a handful of highly symmetric problems that you can attack with this.  The next most common is in <em>differential</em> form using the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del">del operator</a> with either the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_product">dot product</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_product">cross product</a>.  This is a very useful form, although it only holds for Cartesian coordinates, which is rarely the coordinate system of choice for E&amp;M problems.  Another differential form uses the &#8220;div&#8221; and &#8220;curl&#8221; operators, which are not only coordinate system independent, they are also very intuitive.  The &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergence">div</a>&#8221; operator is just that &#8211; a diverging field (one that tends to move outward to infinity) and the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curl_(mathematics)">curl</a>&#8221; operator is a curling field (think of the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-hand_rule">right hand rule</a>&#8220;).</p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=div%5Cmathbf%7BE%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Crho%20%7D%7B%5Cvarepsilon_%7B0%7D%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="div\mathbf{E}=\frac{\rho }{\varepsilon_{0}}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="div\mathbf{E}=\frac{\rho }{\varepsilon_{0}}" /></p>
<p>A charge density produces a <em>diverging</em> electric field (Gauss&#8217;s Law).</p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=div%5Cmathbf%7BB%7D%3D0&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="div\mathbf{B}=0" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="div\mathbf{B}=0" /></p>
<p>No magnetic monopoles means there is no <em>diverging</em> magnetic field (Gauss&#8217;s law for magnetism).</p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=curl%5Cmathbf%7BE%7D%3D-%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20t%7D%5Cmathbf%7BB%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="curl\mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\mathbf{B}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="curl\mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\mathbf{B}" /></p>
<p>A time-varying magnetic field generates a <em>curling</em> electric field that tends to oppose it (Faraday&#8217;s Law).</p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=curl%5Cmathbf%7BB%7D%3D%5Cmu%20_%7B0%7D%5Cmathbf%7BJ%7D%2B%5Cmu%20_%7B0%7D%5Cvarepsilon%20_%7B0%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20t%7D%5Cmathbf%7BE%7D&#038;bg=FFFFFF&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=1" title="curl\mathbf{B}=\mu _{0}\mathbf{J}+\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0}\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\mathbf{E}" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="curl\mathbf{B}=\mu _{0}\mathbf{J}+\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0}\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\mathbf{E}" /></p>
<p>A curling magnetic field is generated by either a current density or a time-varying electric field (Ampere&#8217;s Law).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hephaestusaudio.com/delphi/2008/11/28/physics-friday-maxwells-equations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
